BREAKING: Dr. Fauci Admits COVID Vaccine May Not Be Safe

By John Paluska, Founder of The Washington Gazette

In an interview on Meet The Press, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has hyped the Coronavirus vaccine since day one, just admitted the COVID vaccines he hyped as a way to save lives may not actually be safe. In a live interview with Chuck Todd, the New York Post reports that the epidemiologist blatantly stated that the country needed to "make sure" the vaccine truly is safe before we give it to children and maybe pregnant women, whom Fauci said are generally "vulnerable" to vaccines.

The New York Post cites him as saying:

The reason is traditionally when you have a situation like a new vaccine, you want to make sure, because children as well as pregnant women, are vulnerable, so, before you put it into the children, you’re going to want to make sure you have a degree of efficacy and safety that is established in an adult population, particularly an adult, normal population.

It is for this reason the new vaccine is going to be tested on "hundreds to a couple of thousands" of children, the New York Post reports him saying. 

So, in short, we don't know if this vaccine is safe, but we're going to pump it into children anyways.

But what is particularly striking about his statements are when he said we needed to be certain of the vaccine's safety in a "normal" population. For those of you who are scientifically-minded or work in the field of vaccine testing or statistics, you likely know this means a population that represents the general public

It is worth knowing that no vaccine ever had a "normal" population in any of the tests. Moderna's own trials tell us this:

In the safety analysis of the Phase 3 clinical trial, at the time of vaccination, the mean age of the trial population was 52 years (range 18‑95); 22,831 (75.2%) of participants were 18 to 64 years of age and 7,520 (24.8%) of participants were 65 years of age and older.

Overall, 52.7% of trial participants were male, and 47.3% were female.

Among trial participants in the safety analysis, 20.5% were Hispanic or Latino, 79.2% were White, 10.2% were African American, 4.6% were Asian, 0.8% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 0.2% were Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 2.1% were Other, and 2.1% were Multiracial.

The demographics of the U.S. are ACTUALLY as follows: 50.8% are women, 49.2% are male, 55% are between 18 and 64 years of age, 16.5% are 65 and older, 18.5% are Hispanic or Latino, 76.3% are White, 13.4% are African American, 5.4% are Asian, 1.3% are American Indian or Alaska Native, 2.8% are multiracial.

So, old people were drastically over-represented, and African Americans, Asians, and women were underrepresented. Additionally, Hispanics and Latinos were over-represented, while white people were also over-represented. This is hardly a "normal" population. 

However, we don't even know the preexisting conditions of the sample group and whether that also followed the "normal" population. Moderna doesn't tell us any of this. But not even factoring in the health of the participants, just based on this one sample size we can already see, it becomes clear this test group doesn't align with a "normal" population.

According to Dr. Fauci's recent statements, you only know a vaccine is safe when it hits a "normal" population. So, if we take his statements at face value, there's no way anyone could have said this vaccine was safe because the trials didn't consist of a normal population.

Further, in Pfiizer's test, they blatantly state it was only performed on "healthy individuals." We already know from their own study report on page 41 of the PDF that they did not include people with certain STDs. Additionally, they outline the criteria for being barred from the test on page 145 of the report. But, you know, these "healthy people" somehow are representative of the "normal" public and the FDA approved this vaccine for emergency use despite these shortcomings in the trial.

So yeah, we knew this vaccine was potentially unsafe, and we know it's also potentially unsafe for children and maybe even pregnant women, but the government still authorized it on the general public and now they're trying to authorize it on children. But it doesn't even end there. . .

Dr. Fauci also stated in a White House briefing, according to the New York Post:

If you can show that it’s safe and that in fact it induces the kind of response that is reflective of the protection — mainly the correlate of immunity — what you can do is bridge that to the efficacy data that you got from the 30,000[-person] trial with Moderna and the 44,000[-person] trial that we did with Pfizer.

"If you can show that it's safe." I thought is was safe, Dr. Fauci. I thought the vaccine was safe and effective and that anyone who disagreed was a "conspiracy theorist." The fact of the matter is, you probably don't know if it's safe for children, just like you probably didn't know if it was safe for adults. That's likely why the FDA never actually approved the vaccine but only approve its emergency use and why you said we need to test it on a "normal" population to see if it's safe or not.


SHARE our articles and like our Facebook page and follow us on Twitter!

Post a Comment


  1. Fauci knows that in a week or two there is going to be devastating news released about how toxic and unsafe the vaccines actually are. He's just getting ahead of the news so he won't be blamed.

    1. Do you think this is true? Seems so, I did read that it was in clinical trials for children. Hard to believe he would admit it was unsafe, I won't get it, I have read all I can find about it from the Pfizer's & J&J's website on the matter.

  2. The article would be better if it were edited for typos, grammar.

  3. This is what happens when you put more faith in pharmaceutical thieves than you do in the promises of God:

    1. Well said! Big thumbs up!!

    2. God's can not promise anything. They are nothing more than man-made delusions and tools for control and revenue. Christianity is a copout from Judaism, Islam is a plagiarism from Judaism, Judaism is a plagiarism from the Sumerian and all three are manipulating, murderous and tyrannical.

    3. No, this is what happens, when your corrupted, and heavily invested in the poisoning us bigpharma, and their experimental "vaccines" / so called gene therapy of harm! Like GATES said "Vaccines are the best investment he ever made, a 20-1 profit, our demise, their profit!

  4. And we should care what this filthy, opportunist, '220 million Americans are going to die', lying farce of a 'Dr' has to say?

  5. The Covid vaccines MAY not be safe?
    They ARE not safe! Not safe at all!
    These injections are not even vaccines, but synthetic medical nano material aimed at manipulating people's genomes. Forever changing them, dehumanizing them.
    These injections are KILL SHOTS and Fauci is even a bigger liar than Kill Bill Gates...
    Fauci has been lying and mass murdering for decades with his Aids shenanigans...
    He is the Devil incarnated...

  6. I question whether or not they tested participants for COVID immunity before administering the vaccine. Because a lot of experts seem to be saying there’s crossover (both in test results and also actual immune response) between different coronaviruses - I.e. exposure/immunity to one coronavirus is allegedly supposed to provide immunity to others, and I believe the antibody tests are really just testing for (general) coronavirus antibody and not just COVID. And wouldn’t it be assumed that many/most/some adults already have SOME coronavirus exposure/immunity?

    It is incomprehensible to me that this is being recommended for children and otherwise healthy young people though - especially females of child-bearing age or less, since RNA is known to pass 100% from the mother’s RNA. I really don’t know if I believe the vaccine actually has the power to alter all of the RNA in your whole body, including ova (which are already all formed prior to birth), with just a small injection in the arm, but if it does, we’re talking about altering the RNA of future babies, without understanding the consequences.

    I elected to take the J & J vaccine because I’m 50, don’t plan to have babies in the future, and also I have a close relationship with an “elderly” parent and my husband is diabetic. For me personally the potential benefits outweighed the potential risks. No side effects for me I did just fine. But I was scared and didn’t WANT to take it. And the whole experience made me realize how important it is to allow people to choose whether they want it or not. It was frightening enough for me without having someone forcibly hold me down and stick a needle in me - that’s a terrifying idea.

  7. I'm interested in the population stats. What is the % of Semites? They run the banks, media, and our government but have no listing?

  8. Pfizer tell you clearly at the bottom of their advice sheet that their vaccine does not give you immunity from Covid-19 and that if you get it, you will be infectious to other people. It seems that millions of people either aren't being given the leaflet to read before being jabbed or they're not bothering to read it.